Fashion & Apparel · ES · inditex.com
A written explanation for this grade has not been published yet. The criteria below show what the score rests on.
Every pillar, criterion by criterion — with the rubric level behind each score.
Mixed record; some concerns exist, but severity, recency, or directness is unclear.
Some public labor or supply-chain reporting, but limited detail.
Same category, higher grade — Fashion & Apparel brands that rate better than Inditex.
You represent Inditex? Corrections and new evidence are re-scored by the same methodology — write to privacy@ethica.cc
Some clear labor commitments exist, but they are narrow or weakly evidenced.
Some third-party indication exists, but it is limited or narrow.
Mixed record; some concerns exist, but severity or directness is unclear.
Some public environmental reporting exists, but coverage is limited or patchy.
Some clear targets exist, but they are narrow or weakly evidenced.
Some third-party evidence exists, but it is limited, narrow, or difficult to assess.
Mixed record; some concerns exist, but they are limited, indirect, or unclear.
Some clear policy commitments exist, but they are limited in scope or detail.
Some third-party evidence exists, but it is limited or narrow.
Good-quality public disclosure with useful detail across key governance topics.
No major recent issue found, but evidence is limited or category relevance is lower.
Strong public governance and due-diligence policies across several relevant ethical areas.
Good response quality with visible updates, remediation, or policy improvement.
The grade says what the evidence shows; this says how much evidence stands behind it — five weighted dimensions.
A guardrail capped confidence at 55/100 — the evidence base is too thin or one-sided to score higher.